HughesNet Speed Test Results vs. Speedtest.net results Which test is more accurate?

  • Question
  • Updated 3 years ago
  • Answered
Hi folks. I've been on the premium package for years with a contracted minimum of 1.0mbps minimum speed. HughesNet speed tests are 2.0 and 3.0Mbps and sometimes over. Other websites tests come in consistently below 1.0 which is likely why I can't load my pages. Okay who is lying here? Anyone else on the "premium" plan paying over $119.00 per month feel they are not getting at least 1.0 Mbps - which is what our contract stipulates we shouldn't be below?
Photo of Susan Walker

Susan Walker

  • 6 Posts
  • 1 Like

Posted 3 years ago

  • 2
Photo of Charles Scott

Charles Scott, Champion

  • 2886 Posts
  • 1449 Likes
It isn't at least, they do not advertise this, and no ISP would be stupid enough to advertise a minimum speed from a web server to your home. It is advertised as upto 1.5Mbps down if you are on the 1.5Mbps plan, no higher, the fact you get more than 1.5Mbps means you aren't hitting congestion at that time. Not every web-server is created equal, some get bogged down from attacks, or high normal traffic. Then again, I guess HN controls the entire cloud. I have not yet seen an HN contract state that the minimum speed from every web server on the planet would be no less than 1.0Mbps. If that is the case, they better be running one heck of a feed to my web-server in Arizona.
Photo of Susan Walker

Susan Walker

  • 6 Posts
  • 1 Like
Okay, I was always suspicious about the "minimum" speed. But why the variance in results from HN as compared to other speed tests sites. Thanks for responding, btw.
Photo of marsh_0x

marsh_0x

  • 1035 Posts
  • 90 Likes
Hi Susan Walker
To answer your thread topic Speedtest.net
I'd prefer to use the words they can't handle the "compression" with HN, if you wish then they lie but not on purpose remains a comedy act haha

If you wish I do have 15 different other sites.

With TMN my thread 14 Dec
http://testmy.net/ipb/topic/29482-tes...
Artificially high so is of no use for me or others with the 9000.
Unsure with the 7000 ?

Just tested, I'm in a slight congestion period now on the 1Mb/s plan so quite happy usually 2.2Mb/s.

Hi C0RR0SIVE
I'll get back to you when I see a smile on your car.
9 hours into a fresh install on my Sony Vaio, goodbye Win 8 testing, not ready for prime time release haha

HN
Date/Time Down(kbps) Up(kbps)
06/24/2012 19:52:46
1452
251
.

.
Speak Easy
Photo of Charles Scott

Charles Scott, Champion

  • 2790 Posts
  • 1257 Likes
My car is smiling, the picture just makes it appear other wise. :-p
Photo of sgoshe

sgoshe

  • 4957 Posts
  • 3072 Likes
The HughesNet speed test is pretty accurate mostly. I also have a Network Meter gadget which is very good at showing true speed in 1 second increments.

I rarely get speeds exceeding the advertised speed of 1MB, sometimes when very lucky I might get 1.2 in bursts. Usually I am well under the advertised max running between 400-800kbs.

Being honest. Hope it doesn't upset those in charge but if so, it is what it is.
Photo of Sara for Hughes

Sara for Hughes, Official Rep

  • 4956 Posts
  • 200 Likes
agoshe, as I mentioned many times before... we can't do anything to help until our technicians take a look at your account. Although congestion may be a factor it is only one of many variables involved in making sure your system operates properly. I see you haven't touched base with us since January, that's five months since the last time we did any analysis of your system. The first step is an evaluation by one of our trained technicians, once we have that I can review the notes and run additional tests from here. Continuing to post about speeds without trying to address your concern with our technical department unfortunately, won't resolve your concerns. Thanks, Sara
Photo of Charles Scott

Charles Scott, Champion

  • 2886 Posts
  • 1449 Likes
I think the only time speeds would be impacted even if you aren't under congestion and have plan speeds at that time, is if a website is using any form of encryption. Hughesnet depends upon compressing data heavily, and encrypted connections can't be compressed.

Facebook is one those sites that now defaults users to an HTTPS connection and people tend to complain about that with the flash games taking ages to load, or, at least I have seen a few complaints about that the last few days.

Susan, if you wouldn't care, could you do 5 speed tests back to back and post the results just for us to take a gander?
Photo of Charles Scott

Charles Scott, Champion

  • 2886 Posts
  • 1449 Likes
You may have gotten rid of facebook, but how many others haven't? Maybe when Gen4 comes along, and the 7000 users jump ship and some then 9000 users jump ship to Gen4 then congestion may hide its ugly face. Also, I am experiencing congestion right now, just not as much as you, I think I will post the last month of random tests I have done on your new thread.
Photo of marsh_0x

marsh_0x

  • 1035 Posts
  • 90 Likes
Hi
Almost got rid of Facebook also but now need it for relatives and the closed beta group, 14 friends haha I need them all, closed it as private as I can get i think.

EDIT: wait just read the hidden comments
Dam I know all about congestion with the 7000 the reason I left for WB Legacy,
at EXACTLY 3:01pm cst my speed took a deep dive and started to recover at 11:30pm to norm went on for 2 months the Indians would not understand.
Got lucky to find a number to Miami high support, answer was to change my frequency 1050 to 1000Mhz and back to speed.
Everybody's problems is over crowded transponders.

HN has been dropping the lease of many transponders 7000 and your future looks bleak.
Then upgrading 7000 to 9000 will overload that bird also, sad to say.
Gen4 will probably be fine for 2 years then, probably another upgrade ?

Hi sgoshe
Thanks for serving, 1969-71 my satellite bird Nha Trang Vietnam to down to Clark AFB Philippines another 2 hops to command at Wash DC was quite a treat because the equipment needed to be air conditioned in that heat, ouch was credited 5,000 hours.

Just checked and congestion hit me last month with WB Exede now at 8,850kb/s.
HN 9000 at 1,567kb/s quite liveable tho.
Photo of sgoshe

sgoshe

  • 4957 Posts
  • 3072 Likes
Marsh, you are a good guy. The congestion on KU 127W is horrible. I know you understand.

I will have to jump satellites eventually. I hate the whole process though.
Photo of marsh_0x

marsh_0x

  • 1035 Posts
  • 90 Likes
Hi sgoshe
Think it was the 117W bird ?
If you jump recommend the Echostar 17 Gen4 bird makes the only logical sense.
Exede usually runs 16,000kb/s with a ping 700ms
Gen4 expect 20,000kb/s ping perhaps even better will open up new doors

Ah bought a Magic Jack last week but haven't tested it yet, other forums are saying quite nice, Grr I'm paying landline $52 and seriously wonder why as I hate the phone haha
Photo of Charles Scott

Charles Scott, Champion

  • 2886 Posts
  • 1449 Likes
Your phone is cheap, mine is almost as much as my satellite service. o.0
Maybe if HN employs good client side caching of websites using user replaceable SD cards it would help with some the congestion. A single user with local caching of a few hundred images that never change wont help congestion, but if the entire network deployed client side cache like that, it could potentially decrease over-all load on the network when people use it the most. HN just has to be careful of what they have the modem cache, and how the modem updates the cache. Helps quiet a bit IMO, been playing with SQUID for two months, and image heavy websites load in almost no time after a few accesses.

Sure the "Turbo Page" helps since it does some caching, but, from my understanding it doesn't do any work client side like a real cache proxy would do for a user. I remember hearing about using SQUID proxies back when dial up was mainstream, was originally made for slow connections from my understanding.

In my mind it seems like it would work out ok in the end, might prolong how far off congestion will show its face again.

Sgoshe, I am sorry if it seems like I don't understand, but I can assure you, I do understand, I have had days where my connection goes to complete crap due to congestion.